Robert Merton is i of the most sophisticated exponents of a qualified functionalism inwards sociology ( Social Theory together with Social ...
Robert Merton is i of the most sophisticated exponents of a qualified functionalism inwards sociology (Social Theory together with Social Structure). He finds that before versions of sociological functionalism were conceptually flawed. Here is how he characterizes the classic theory of functionalism:
We should attend get-go to the listing of damage ostensibly referring to the same concept: purpose, function, motive, designed, secondary consideration, primary concern, aim. Through inspection, it becomes clear that these damage grouping into quite distinct conceptual frames of reference. At times, some of these damage — move, design, aim together with purpose — clearly advert to the explicit ends-in-view of the representatives of the state. Others motive, secondary consideration — advert to the ends -in-view of the victim of the crime. And both of these sets of damage are alike inwards referring to the subjective anticipations of the results of punishment. But the concept of component division involves the standpoint of the observer, non necessarily that of the participant. Social component division refers to observable objective consequences, non to subjective dispositions (aims, motives, purposes). And the failure to distinguish betwixt the objective sociological consequences together with the subjective dispositions inevitably leads to confusion of functional analysis. (78)And hither is a fairly clear contention of the logic of functional analysis as practiced past times social anthropologists similar Evans-Pritchard together with Malinowski, according to Merton:
Substantially, these postulates concord first, that standardized social activities or cultural items are functional for the entire social or cultural system; second, that all such social together with cultural items fulfill sociological functions; together with third, that these items are consequently indispensable. Although these 3 articles of organized religious belief are normally seen exclusively inwards i another’s company, they had best live examined separately, since each gives ascension to its ain distinctive difficulties. (79)Merton offers careful critique of all 3 postulates.
In scrutinizing first, the demand of functional unity, nosotros institute that i cannot assume total integration of all societies, but that this is an empirical query of fact inwards which nosotros should live prepared to expose a hit of degrees of integration…
Review of the instant demand of universal functionalism, which holds that all persisting forms of civilization are inevitably functional, resulted inwards other considerations which must live met past times a codified approach to functional interpretation. It appeared non exclusively that nosotros must live prepared to expose dysfunctional as good as functional consequences of these forms but that the theorist volition ultimately live confronted alongside the hard work of developing an organon for assessing the internet repose of consequences if his research is to take away hold bearing on social technology….
The demand of indispensability, nosotros institute entailed 2 distinct propositions: the i alleging the indispensability of for certain functions, together with this gives ascension to the concept of functional necessity or functional pre-requisites; the other alleging the indispensability of existing social institutions, civilization forms, or the like, together with this when suitably questioned, gives ascension to the concept of functional alternatives, equivalents or substitutes. (90)Merton draws an of import distinction betwixt manifest together with latent functions -- betwixt the direct observable beneficial consequences of a given social organisation together with the indirect together with unobservable consequences that the organisation may have.
But armed alongside the concept of latent function, the sociologist extends his research inwards those rattling directions which hope most for the theoretic evolution of the discipline. He examines the familiar (or planned) social exercise to ascertain the latent, together with therefore to a greater extent than oftentimes than non unrecognized, functions (as well, of course, as the manifest functions). He considers, for example, the consequences of the novel wage programme for, say, the merchandise union inwards which the workers are organized.... There is some evidence that it is exactly at the betoken where the research attending of sociologists has shifted from the airplane of manifest to the airplane of latent functions that they take away hold made their distinctive together with major contributions. (120)In the “organon” that Merton sketches for sociological functionalism inwards this book, he emphasizes the crucial role played past times the search for mechanisms. We demand to empathize how functional properties of a characteristic are conveyed to the social arrangements that they affect. (Note that this is non the same as searching for the mechanisms through which the functional properties are brought about. Merton addresses this latter query nether the topic of structural dynamics together with change.)
Concepts of the mechanisms through which functions are fulfilled.. Functional analysis inwards sociology, as inwards other disciplines similar physiology together with psychology, calls for a “concrete together with detailed” work concern human relationship of the mechanisms which operate to perform a designated function. This refers, non to psychological, but to social, mechanisms (e.g., role-segmentation, insulation f institutional demands, hierarchic ordering of values, social partition of labor, ritual together with ceremonial enactments, etc.). (106)These passages demonstrate that Merton’s human relationship to functionalism is complex, together with the functionalism that he endorses is non the a priori methodology advocated past times before theorists. However, he accepts the basic thought that nosotros tin explicate (some) social features based on the positive consequences they create for the social scheme or of import parts of the social system.
The thought of sociological functionalism has been substantially discredited inwards sociology. Functionalism maintains that social features -- institutions, values, laws -- take away hold the characteristics they possess because they serve of import needs of the social order. Or to pose the betoken the other agency around, a social monastic enjoin comes to take away hold features that are functionally good adapted to serving the needs of lodge (or powerful groups inside society). Marx makes such a contention when he asserts that the country is the managing commission of the bourgeoisie, or that the superstructure of capitalist lodge exists to stabilize the belongings relations of the economical structure. Jon Elster offered compelling critiques of functionalism inwards his discussions of Gerry Cohen's link). These criticisms were formulated alongside honor to historical materialism, but they are as compelling for other functionalist theories as well.
Fundamentally the critique of sociological functionalism depends on discrediting an analogy betwixt biological scientific discipline together with sociology. The linguistic communication of functional adaptation of organs to scheme finds its source inwards biology; the pump serves to sustain the organism past times pumping blood. But, as Elster together with others betoken out, in that place is a crucial disanalogy betwixt biological scientific discipline together with sociology. This is the fact of natural alternative together with evolution inwards the biological case, which has no unopen analog inwards the social case. We take away hold a rattling adept agreement of the machinery that leads the physiology of a species to live good adapted to serving the reproductive together with survival needs of the organism; this is the machinery of natural selection. But social entities are non dependent to analogous alternative pressures.
So the functionalist thought of lodge is suspect because it depends on a cardinal mystery: how tin the effects of a social features live thought to explicate its emergence together with structure? How tin the fact that XYZ scheme of norms almost spousal human relationship has the effect of creating a docile workforce explicate the being of that laid of norms inwards society? Doesn't this larn the temporal monastic enjoin of causation backwards? It is non impossible to render answers to this question; but nosotros cannot choose it as a dogmatic supposition that lodge volition unavoidably live organized inwards such a agency that its needs are satisfied past times good tuned institutions.
There is i reply to this query that makes perfect sense: the machinery of purposive design. There is no mystery inwards the fact that a rudder exists to steer the ship; it was designed past times the ship builder to do exactly that. And perchance it is no less straightforward to assert that the audit component division inwards a enterprise exists to forbid dishonest behaviour inside the organization. Intelligent managers, foreseeing the temptation to fiddle accounts, designed a scheme for detecting together with punishing fiddling.
What is to a greater extent than hard to translate is a claim almost the social component division of a characteristic where the postulated consequences of the workings of the features are obscure (latent, inwards Merton's terms), together with where the characteristic took shape as the final result of the independent actions of numerous actors over time. The get-go betoken makes intelligent blueprint hard to send out, together with the instant makes it implausible to assume the being of the intelligent designer at all.
It is non impossible to imagine social mechanisms that powerfulness choose almost a functional adaptation of a social organisation to the needs of the system. Here is a machinery that complements the intelligent blueprint mechanism. Call it the "slow accumulation of interested adjustments" mechanism. Suppose that a social organisation is introduced through legislation -- a policy governing rule of private activities to protect wellness together with safety. And suppose that the details of the policy are opened upwardly to modification over fourth dimension past times a legislative process. At whatsoever given fourth dimension in that place volition live groups together with individuals whose interests are affected past times the policy. When modifications are considered, groups tin advocate for improvements that favor their interests. And if in that place are groups inside lodge that basis disproportionate powerfulness together with influence, nosotros tin facial expression that the modifications that are selected volition to a greater extent than oftentimes than non live ones favored past times this group. This machinery implies that the policy volition live "tuned" over fourth dimension to piece of work inwards such a agency as to serve the interests of the influential group.
This machinery is unlike from the intelligent blueprint machinery because it assumes exclusively local modifications over fourth dimension -- non a unitary optimal planning together with blueprint process. It looks to a greater extent than similar an evolutionary procedure -- myopic but directional. But the machinery of conception together with alternative is unlike from the biological case. Innovations hold upwardly because they are preferred past times influential stakeholders. And the medium- together with long-term final result is a drift inwards the management of correspond betwixt the working characteristics of the policy together with the needs together with interests of the influential groups.
This gives us a unlike together with to a greater extent than sociologically credible agency of defending the thought that of import social arrangements volition live "functionally adapted" to satisfying the needs of the powerful groups inwards lodge -- non because those groups direct designed the arrangements, but because they had influence on the procedure of refinement together with adjustment that led to the nowadays configuration.
This suggests that sociological functionalism is non fundamentally impossible. Instead, it shows that a functional claim must live complemented alongside an work concern human relationship of how the postulated correspondence betwixt the characteristics of the organisation together with the needs of the scheme came to live -- how the organisation was developed inwards ways that led it towards a higher marker of fittedness to the needs of some of import social-systemic characteristic.
COMMENTS