The topic of the historicity of academic disciplines has come upward up numerous times inwards this forum. It is a conviction of mine th...
The topic of the historicity of academic disciplines has come upward up numerous times inwards this forum. It is a conviction of mine that disciplines demonstrate a swell bargain of path dependency over fourth dimension inwards their evolution. We tin intend of a dependent area every bit beingness constituted at a fourth dimension past times some or all of these elements:
- a Definition of of import questions for research
- a Definition of appropriate methods of enquiry too analysis
- a model of explanation inwards the field
- some fundamental examples of what theories too hypotheses ought to facial expression like
- institutions for supporting, organizing, too directing enquiry efforts
- institutions for validating too disseminating enquiry findings
- institutions for grooming immature researchers inwards the fundamental elements of the discipline
If this is a reasonable approximation to the social reality of an academic discipline, what does it propose most contingency too path-dependency inwards the evolution of the discipline? For 1 thing, it suggests multiple sources of contingency both internal to the intellectual company too external to it. Internally, a dependent area similar philosophy or a sub-discipline similar the philosophy of heed is driven inwards business office past times a somewhat logical procedure of assault on existing problems -- what Kuhn referred to every bit "normal science", too partly past times large, compelling breakthroughs past times individuals or small-scale groups (for example, the Vienna Circle). Externally, it is straightforward to position political too institutional influences that shape the enquiry agenda at diverse times inwards diverse disciplines -- the preference for positivism inwards sociology that was advanced past times considerations of the Cold War, for example. And inside the institutional setting of the disciplines in that location are contingencies every bit good -- for example, a rigid editor of a leading periodical or enquiry laboratory tin fix the agenda for theory too methodology inwards a dependent area for a generation. (Andrew Abbott describes this variety of influence inwards Department too Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred.)
Almost every chemical constituent inwards this listing is itself visibly dependent on historical circumstances inwards multiple ways. Take the number of defining the of import questions for research. There are political too governmental influences on the Definition of enquiry problems -- witness the influence of the Cold War on the evolution of the social sciences, the run that is played past times governmental funding agencies similar the NSF or NIH, too the occasional intrusion of political pressure level into scientific fields similar environmental scientific discipline too sociology.
Within the community of individuals currently pursuing the dependent area or proto-discipline in that location is a make of levels of talent too innovation, on the 1 hand, too prestige too influence, on the other. (The 2 categories don't necessarily correlate perfectly.) One charismatic private or local grouping (Wittgenstein, say) may exert influence over the direction of a sub-field through charisma too the ability of his or her ideas. Another may exert influence over the strategic placement he or she occupies inwards the institutions of influence -- major graduate schools or prominent journals, for example. And inwards each case, the dependent area moves to a novel stage amongst novel questions too ideas.
Bourdieu's theoretical build of the champaign (link) is real relevant to these forms of influence on the evolution of a given academic discipline. By locating diverse individuals inside the network of institutions, scholars, too funding sources it is possible to exertion to slice together the ways inwards which their ain enquiry agendas unfolded (responding to incentives created past times their field) too the influence they exerted on other scholars. Neil Gross's sociological biography of Richard Rorty illustrates this variety of analysis (link), every bit does much of George Steinmetz's enquiry on the evolution of sociology every bit a dependent area inwards France, Germany, too the US.
What all of this seems to back upward is the watch that the academic disciplines are inwards fact highly contingent inwards their development, too that in that location is no argue to facial expression convergence approximately a unmarried "best" version of the discipline. The history of disciplines should improve live on understood inwards analogy to the brachiation too differentiation associated amongst the evolution of species too sub-species over fourth dimension -- lots of contingency, amongst a consequent specialization of the intermediate results to the demands of a item betoken inwards time. This implies that a dependent area similar sociology or political scientific discipline could accept developed real differently, amongst substantially unlike ideas most enquiry questions too methods. And this seems to live on truthful for similar reasons inwards the humanities every bit good every bit the natural sciences too mathematics. Finally, this suggests that in that location is no end-point -- no "universal sociology," no "final philosophy," no "complete mathematics." Instead, every dependent area inwards its search for noesis too novel ideas is charting novel intellectual space.

COMMENTS