Here is a reply to my before post on social ontology together with construction from Doug Porpora, professor of sociology, Drexel Univer...
Here is a reply to my before post on social ontology together with construction from Doug Porpora, professor of sociology, Drexel University. Doug is the writer of Reconstructing Sociology: The Critical Realist Approach. Thanks, Doug, for this thoughtful together with considered reflection!
FROM DOUG PORPORA:
I bring 4 comments inwards response. First, piece I am happy to stand upwards somewhere amongst John Levi Martin, ane of import departure betwixt us is that I attach reality – together with fifty-fifty an emergent mind-independence – to the relations connecting social positions whereas, I believe, he would not.
Second, sticking roughly an ordinary linguistic communication feel of the word, I would bound the give-and-take construction to those connecting relations together with non to the higher marking things y'all beak of. I would rather telephone telephone the higher marking entities institutions.
Third, every bit y'all suggest, I sure enough create non deny the beingness of families, social movements, clubs together with states. But they appear to me to survive a nexus of connections amid social positions.
My 4th reflection is to a greater extent than uncertain. Do those things – states, etc. – correspond some form of emergent entities together with every bit such a higher marking of thing? You are non lonely inwards pushing me inwards this direction. Most boyfriend critical realists would create so, together with Ruth Groff has lately been trying to larn me to create the same.
I sure enough believe inwards emergence rather than reductionism. I believe life is a marking emergent from non-life together with consciousness a nonetheless higher emergent level, together with self-consciousness an fifty-fifty farther emergent level.
I believe emergence is to a greater extent than full general than only these levels, but permit us rest there. In the instance of each of these levels, a novel form of causality emerges non works life on the marking below – replication together with natural pick inwards the instance of life, phonation communication acts inwards the instance of linguistic consciousness. The emergence of these novel causal powers tin survive explained yesteryear the marking below but non their functioning.
Is at that topographic point anything similar that going on with the putative emergent entities of families together with states together with such? I suppose I would say that something similar Durkheimian social cohesion is an instance of a novel causal holding non associated with private people. So, every bit y'all suggest, create novel causal properties emerge from people inwards social life? Yes.
Do these wholes together with their properties constitute a marking inwards the same agency every bit does life or consciousness? I would say no for 2 reasons. First, every bit novel causal kinds, phonation communication acts together with natural pick deed direct from whole to whole. We tin explicate the causal logic connecting the holistic demeanor without micro-analysis of their parts.
I create non meet anything similar that going on with social cohesion. Any number it has on other wholes cannot survive explained without manifesting through private behavior. There is no novel causal logic here. I hollo back y'all would agree, no? Second, whatever new, putative causal logic is ever every bit good penetrated yesteryear acts of what Hegel called “world historical individuals” to constitute an autonomous level.
So socially emergent entities, okay. An autonomous marking of them every bit per sociological holism? In my opinion, no. Thanks ane time again for the reflection.
Doug
COMMENTS