Does the social basis replace facts nearly individuals together with the physical environs of action? Brian Epstein argues non inwards s...
Does the social basis replace facts nearly individuals together with the physical environs of action? Brian Epstein argues non inwards several places, most notably inwards "Ontological Individualism Reconsidered" (2009; link). (I invention to process Epstein's to a greater extent than recent arguments inwards his really interesting book The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences in a later post.) The gist of his declaration is the thought that at that topographic point are other factors influencing social facts also facts nearly individuals. Social facts thence neglect to supervene inwards the strict sense: they depend on facts other than facts nearly individuals. There are indeed differences at the score of the social that practice non tally to a divergence inwards the facts at the score of the individual. Here is how Epstein puts the gist of his argument:
My aim inwards this newspaper is to challenge this [the thought that individualism is merely the denial of spooky social autonomy]. But ontological individualism is a stronger thesis than this, together with on whatever plausible interpretation, it is false. The ground is non that social properties are determined past times something other than physical properties of the world. Instead it is that social properties are oftentimes determined past times physical ones that cannot plausibly hold upwards taken to hold upwards individualistic properties of persons. Only if the thesis of ontological individualism is weakened to the indicate that it is equivalent to physicalism tin it hold upwards true, but thence it fails to hold upwards a thesis nearly the conclusion of social properties past times individualistic ones. (3)And hither is how Epstein formulates the claim of weakly local supervenience of social properties upon private properties:
Social properties weakly locally supervene on individualistic properties if together with only if for whatever possible basis w together with whatever entities x together with y inwards w, if x together with y are individualistically indiscernible inwards w, thence they are socially indiscernible inwards w. Two objects are individualistically- or socially-indiscernible if together with only if they are just similar amongst honour to every individualistic holding or every social property, respectively. (9)The causal story for supervenience of the social upon the private perchance looks similar this:
In this instance supervenience fails because at that topographic point tin hold upwards differences inwards southward without whatever divergence inwards I (because of differences inwards O).
But maybe the province of affairs is fifty-fifty worse, every bit emergentists desire to hold:
In i feel Epstein's business of thought is fairly slow to grasp. The number of a game of baseball game betwixt the New York Yankees together with the Boston Red Sox depends largely on the actions of the players on the plain together with inwards the dugout; but non entirely together with strictly. There are background facts together with circumstances that also influence the number but are non acquaint inwards the motions together with thoughts of the players. The rules of baseball game are non embodied on the plain or inwards the minds of the players; thence at that topographic point may hold upwards possible worlds inwards which the same pitches, swings, impacts of bats on balls, catches, etc., occur; together with all the same the number of the game is different. The Boston pitcher may hold upwards afterward flora to hold upwards ineligible to play that day, together with the Red Sox are held to forfeit the game. The dominion inwards our basis holds that "tie goes to the runner"; whereas inwards alto-world it may hold upwards that the necktie goes to the defensive team; together with this way that the two-run homer inwards the 9th does non termination inwards 2 runs, but rather the terminal out. So the game does non depend on the actions of the players alone, but on distant together with abstract facts nearly the rules of the game.
So, according to Epstein, local supervenience of the social upon the private fails. What nearly global supervenience? He believes that this relation fails every bit well. And this is because, for Epstein, "social properties are determined past times physical properties that are non plausibly the properties of individuals" (20). These are the "other facts" inwards the diagrams above. His simplest illustration is this: without cellos at that topographic point tin hold upwards no cellists (24). And without hanging chads, George W. Bush would non receive got been President. And, later, i tin hold upwards an environmental criminal because of a ready of facts that were both distant together with unknown to the private at the fourth dimension of a sure as shooting activity (33).
Epstein's analysis is careful together with convincing inwards its ain terms. Given the modal specification of the important of supervenience (as offered past times Jaegwon Kim together with successors), Epstein makes a powerful instance for believing that the social does non replace the private inwards a technical together with specifiable sense. However, I'm non sure as shooting that really much follows from this finding. For researchers inside the full general schoolhouse of thought of "actor-centered sociology", their enquiry strategy is probable to rest i that seeks to form out the mechanisms through which social outcomes of involvement are created every bit a termination of the actions together with interactions of individuals. If Epstein's arguments are accepted, that implies that nosotros should non couch that enquiry strategy inwards damage of the thought of supervenience. But this does non invalidate the strategy, or the broad intuition nearly the relation betwixt the social together with the actions of locally situated actors upon which it rests. These are the intuitions that I endeavour to limited through the thought of "methodological localism"; link, link. And since I also desire to debate for the possibility of "relative explanatory autonomy" for facts at the score of the social (for example, features of an organization; link), I am non too troubled past times the failure of a persuasion of the social together with private that denies strict conclusion of the old past times the latter. (Here is an before ship where I wrestled amongst the thought of supervenience; link.)
COMMENTS