Image: Yellow River, Qing Dynasty Image: Free too Slave States, the U.S.A. 1850 One approach to causal explanation involves seekin...
Image: Yellow River, Qing Dynasty
Image: Free too Slave States, the U.S.A. 1850
One approach to causal explanation involves seeking out the mechanisms too processes that Pb to exceptional outcomes. McAdam, Tarrow, too Tilly illustrate this approach inward their handling of contentious politics inward Dynamics of Contention
This is a fairly "micro" approach to explanation too analysis. It seeks to sympathize how a given procedure plant past times looking for the causal mechanisms that underlie it. But non all explanatory questions inward the social sciences autumn at this flat of aggregation. Some researchers are less interested inward the micro-pathways of exceptional episodes too to a greater extent than interested inward the abiding social forces too arrangements that influence the administration of modify inward social systems. For example, Marx declared an explanatory hypothesis along these lines inward the Communist Manifesto
Large social factors at this flat include things similar the inequalities of mightiness too chance created past times various holding systems; the logic of a competitive corporate capitalist economy; the large social consequences of climate modify -- whether inward the Little Ice Age or the electrical flow day; the strategic too military machine interests of various nations; too the social too economical consequences of ubiquitous mobile computation too communication abilities. Researchers every bit various every bit Karl Marx, Manuel Castells, Carl von Clausewitz, too William McNeill accept sought out causal hypotheses that endeavor to explicate largescale historical modify every bit the consequence, inward part, of the exceptional configurations too variations of macro factors similar these. Outcomes similar success inward war, the ascendance of i acre or share over others, the configuration of mightiness too payoff across social groups inside modern democracies, too the economical rising of i share over around other are all largescale outcomes that researchers accept sought to explicate every bit the number of other largescale social, economic, too political factors.
These approaches are non logically incompatible. If nosotros follow along amongst William McNeill (Plagues too Peoples - Central Role Infectious Disease Plays inward World History) too consider the sentiment that the modern distribution of national mightiness across the globe is a number of the vulnerability of various regions to disease, nosotros are fully engaged inward the sentiment that macro factors accept macro consequences. But it is also opened upwards to us to inquire the question, how create these macro factors run at the to a greater extent than granular level? What are the local mechanisms that underlay the dynamics of affliction inward Southeast Asia, West Africa, or South America? So nosotros tin ever shift focus upwards too downwards, too nosotros tin ever aspect for to a greater extent than granular explanations for whatever shape of social causal influence. And inward fact, around historical sociologists succeed inward combining both approaches; for example, Michael Isle of Mann inward his report of fascism (Fascists
That said, the pragmatics of the 2 approaches are quite different. And the logic of causal enquiry appears to differ every bit well. The causal mechanisms theory of explanation suggests unopen comparative report of private cases -- exceptional rebellions, exceptional episodes of population change, exceptional moments of modify of government. The "large social factor" approach to explanation suggests a dissimilar flat of research, a enquiry method that permits comparing of large outcomes too the co-variance of putative causal factors. Mill's methods of causal reasoning appear to hold upwards to a greater extent than relevant to this type of causal hypothesis. Theda Skocpol's report of social revolution in States too Social Revolutions
The harder interrogation is this: are the large social factors mentioned hither legitimate "causes", or are they precisely placeholders for to a greater extent than granular report of exceptional mechanisms too pathways? Should reference to "capitalism," "world trading system," or "modern European reproductive regime" hold upwards expected to disappear inward the ideal historical sociology of the future? Or is this "large structure" vocabulary an altogether justified too stable flat of social analysis on the footing of which to develop historical too social explanations? I am inclined to believe that the latter seat is correct, too that it is legitimate to conceive of social enquiry at a attain of levels of aggregation (link, link). The impulse towards disaggregation is a scientifically respectable one, but it should non hold upwards understood every bit replacing analysis at a higher level.
(The illustrations inward a higher house were chosen to furnish examples of historical processes (the silting of waterways too patterns of slaveholding) that acknowledge of explanation inward price of largescale historical factors (climate, geography, too political systems).)
COMMENTS