Neil Gross has a remarkably goodness ear for philosophy. And this extends especially to his occasional treatments of the influences that ...
Neil Gross has a remarkably goodness ear for philosophy. And this extends especially to his occasional treatments of the influences that helped shape the dependent of philosophy inwards the U.S. inwards the instant one-half of the twentieth century. His sociological biography of Richard Rorty is a tour de force (link). There he skillfully maps the “field” of American philosophy (in the Bourdieusian sense) together with places the evolution of Rorty’s thought inside the landmarks of the field. The majority is an fantabulous exemplar of the novel sociology of ideas, bringing together material, symbolic, together with intellectual forces that influence the management together with shape of an intellectual tradition.
In his contribution to Craig Calhoun’s Sociology inwards America: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 History Gross offers a real brusk description of the ideological together with social forces that helped to create upward one's heed the directions taken past times the philosophy dependent inwards the post-war years, together with this likewise is real illuminating. In contrast to historians of philosophy who tell the even out of the evolution of a current inwards price of the internal intellectual problems together with debates that determined it, Gross seeks to seat unopen to of the external factors that made the terrain hospitable to this displace or that. (Consider, past times contrast, the internalist even out that Michael Beaney tells inwards The Analytic Turn: Analysis inwards Early Analytic Philosophy together with Phenomenology together with inwards many chapters of The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy.) Several paragraphs are worth quoting at length, since philosophers are unlikely to browse this collection on the history of American sociology.
Within academic philosophy, pragmatism’s stature was diminished considerably inwards the 1940s, 1950s, together with 1960s every bit a final result of the ascent of what is called analytic philosophy. Analytic philosophy began alongside the efforts of G. E. Moore together with Bertrand Russell inwards England to crunch the idealism that had travel pop at that topographic point afterward years when empiricism dominated (Delacampagne 1999). Russell, influenced past times the efforts of Gottlob Frege to educate a formal organization past times which logical propositions could survive represented, took the stance that novel calorie-free could survive shed on long-standing philosophical problems if attending were paid to the linguistic communication inwards which they are expressed, together with to the logical assumptions underlying that language. Russell made crucial contributions to the philosophy of mathematics, inwards which he tried, similar Frege, to cut mathematics topologic, simply he also sought to educate an choice metaphysics according to which objects inwards the reason are seen every bit composed of logical atoms to which to a greater extent than complex entities tin survive reduced. The immature Ludwig Wittgenstein studied nether Russell together with picked upward where he together with Frege left off, contention inwards the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1922) that facts, non logical atoms or objects per se, compose the world, together with that linguistic communication — which represents facts — does hence past times “picturing” them inwards logically valid propositions. On the footing of this assumption, Wittgenstein claimed that many traditional philosophical problems — especially those concerning ethics, metaphysics, together with aesthetics, which create non come across these criteria for picturing — are nonsensical. (201-202)Gross goes on to depict the advent of ordinary linguistic communication philosophy (Ryle, Austin), together with the logical positivists. The positivists are especially of import inwards his even out together with inwards the subsequent evolution of professional person academic philosophy inwards the United States.
The positivists, along alongside their counterparts at Oxford together with Cambridge, had an enormous touching on on U.S. philosophy, giving ascent to a novel trend together with tradition of philosophical scholarship. (202)And Gross offers a sociological together with political hypothesis for why analytic philosophy prevailed over pragmatism together with idealism.
That analytic philosophy, at to the lowest degree inwards its early on stages, downgraded the condition of political philosophy may also take away maintain helped protect the champaign from critical scrutiny during the McCarthy era (McCumber 2001). Within the infinite of a few years, philosophers who saw themselves every bit working inwards the analytic tradition came to dominate almost all the top-ranked U.S. philosophy graduate programs, analytic travel became hegemonic inwards the major academic journals, together with analysts came to assume leadership positions inwards the American Philosophical Association (Wilshire 2002). Pragmatism was marginalized every bit a consequence. Russell, for his part, had been sharply critical of Dewey, accusing pragmatism of beingness a philosophy “in harmony alongside the historic current of industrialism together with collective enterprise” because it involved a “belief inwards human ability together with the unwillingness to acknowledge ‘stubborn facts,’” which manifested itself inwards the stance that the truth of a belief is a affair of its effects rather than its causes. Some American philosophers, similar Chicago’s Charles Morris, tried to combine pragmatism together with logical positivism, piece others, similar Quine or his Harvard colleague Morton White, brought pragmatism together with linguistic analysis together inwards other ways. Nevertheless, many who worked inwards an analytic trend came to regard pragmatism together with analytic philosophy every bit opposed, together with pragmatism’s reputation went into decline. (203)This is a nuanced together with plausible precis of the evolution of academic philosophy during these decades, together with the cloth influences that Gross cites (the influx of Vienna-school philosophers caused past times the ascent of Nazism, the political threat of McCarthyism) seem to survive genuine historical causes of the ascent of analytic philosophy dominance. And, consistent alongside the methods together with priorities of the novel sociology of ideas (link), Gross is real sensitive to the particulars of the institutions, journals, together with associations through which a dependent seeks to define itself.
Contrast this narrative alongside the brief work organization human relationship offered past times Michael Beaney inwards his introduction to The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy. Beaney likewise points out the importance of the exodus of positivist philosophers from Europe caused past times the Nazi ascent to ability (kl 636). But the residual of his work organization human relationship works through the noun ideas together with debates that took oculus phase inwards academic philosophy inwards the 1940s together with 1950s. To read his account, philosophy moved forrad every bit a outcome of a serial of logical debates.
Agreement on the primal founders already gives unopen to shape to the analytic tradition -- every bit a starting fourth dimension approximation, nosotros tin characterize it every bit what is inspired past times their work. With this inwards mind, nosotros tin together with then seat 2 subsequent strands inwards analytic philosophy that educate the ideas of its 4 founders [Russell, Moore, Frege, Wittgenstein]. The starting fourth dimension is the Cambridge School of Analysis ... together with the instant is logical empiricism. (kl 826)The impetus of Gross's involvement inwards the evolution of analytic philosophy inwards American universities was the touching on this displace had on pragmatism. Essentially Gross argues that pragmatism was pushed into a small-scale fry purpose inside academic philosophy past times the ascendency of positivism together with analytic philosophy, together with that the latter occurred because of social factors inwards the academy together with gild at large. Cheryl Misak is a contemporary practiced on pragmatism (The American Pragmatists, New Pragmatists), together with she disputes this stance from a surprising signal of view: she argues that analytical philosophy genuinely absorbed the greater purpose of pragmatism, together with that ane could brand the example that pragmatist ideas take away maintain slap-up contemporary influence inside philosophy. Her declaration is summarized inwards "Rorty, Pragmatism, together with Analytic Philosophy" (link).
When the logical empiricists arrived inwards America, they constitute a soil inwards which their seat could thrive. They did non travel far inwards a dry reason that was inhospitable to their view, nor did they request to uproot the stance they constitute already planted there. (373)She argues that Peirce's pragmatism had much inwards mutual alongside positivism, together with she traces a fairly instantly lineage from Peirce through Dewey together with C.I. Lewis to Quine, Goodman, together with Roy Wood Sellars. Here is her conclusion:
The epistemology together with the stance of truth that dominated analytic philosophy from the 1930s logical empiricism correct through to the reign of Quine, Goodman, together with Sellars inwards the 1950s–60s was inwards fact pragmatism. The stars of modern analytic philosophy were real much inwards measurement alongside pragmatism during the years inwards which it was supposedly driven out of philosophy departments past times analytic philosophers. (380)It seems to me that it is possible that both Misak together with Gross are right, because they are concerned alongside different aspects of the "field" of academic philosophy. Misak is focusing on the issues of content, logic, together with epistemology, together with she finds that at that topographic point is a substantial continuity on these issues across the literature of both analytic philosophy together with classical pragmatism. But Gross has taken a broader focus: what are the paradigmatic topics together with modes of approach that were feature of analytic philosophy together with pragmatism? What were the "styles" of thinking that were feature of analytic philosophy together with pragmatism? And he is correct inwards thinking that, had Peirce, James, together with Dewey together with their successors prevailed past times dominating the primary enquiry departments of philosophy, American academic philosophy would take away maintain looked real different.
COMMENTS