Frédéric Vandenberghe is an of import contributor to the philosophy of critical realism. His interesting mass A Philosophical History of ...
Frédéric Vandenberghe is an of import contributor to the philosophy of critical realism. His interesting mass A Philosophical History of High German Sociology appeared inwards 2008, which started life equally his PhD thesis inwards 1994. Like an before tradition of historians of sociology (e.g. Raymond Aron, Main Currents inwards Sociological Thought: Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, de Tocqueville, Sociologists too the Revolution of 1848 too Robert Nisbet, The Sociological Tradition), Vandenberghe traces the origins of sociology to the origins of modernity -- inwards his chronology, the mid-nineteenth century too beginnings of the twentieth century.
Despite the quite understandable style of historians of ideas to describe the origins of sociology equally far dorsum equally possible, returning to Plato’s Republic too Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, at that topographic point is instantly a full general acknowledgement that sociology emerged equally a relatively autonomous discipline, distinct from economic science too political science, inwards the nineteenth century. Sociology cannot move separated from the regain of the relative autonomy of society, which is linked to the advent of modernity: correct from the start, the novel land of report expressed the self- reflexive mental attitude of modern societies towards themselves, too to what eludes them. As a sub-system of science, which is a sub-system of society, sociology tin move viewed equally a variety of large-scale psychoanalysis that seeks to let on the historicity too facticity of functionally differentiated modern societies. (kl 169)But dissimilar Aron too Nisbet, his concern human relationship highlights the critical aspects of the sociological tradition. His key figures are Marx, Simmel, Weber, Lukács, Horkheimer, Adorno, too Habermas, too a persistent theme is that of criticism and demystification. This leaves him perfectly positioned to translate too contribute to the philosophical corpus of critical realism.
What does he hateful yesteryear the "autonomization" of society? It is the emergence inwards the modern globe of a separation betwixt social causation too the individuals who brand upwards society; the evolution of a social surroundings inwards which individuals are "subject" to the constraints of society; a separation betwixt lodge too the individual. Vandenberghe explicitly draws the connecter betwixt this concept too Marx's project design of alienation: "human products are objectified, dehumanized, too eventually plough against their creators" (kl 200). But he equally good suggests that this concept is inherently linked to the thought of reification -- the mental creation of social entities independent of subjective individuals; the "hypostasis of concepts" (kl 428). "Whether inwards Marx, Weber, Simmel too Lukacs, or Horkheimer, Adorno too Habermas, inwards every representative nosotros meet the dual interrogation of the reification of the globe too the alienation of the human existence equally the fundamental theme that forms too informs their work" (kl 248).
Throughout I've argued for the thought of the demand for microfoundations for largescale social structures too forces. Does V's version of social theory contradict that premise? There is a tension, to move sure. But cypher that I read hither is inconsistent alongside the notion that the causal powers of the social globe are made upwards of the actions too states of hear of the individuals who compose society. V's request seems to move a different one: these congealed patterns of activity too thought create constraints that are coercive for everyone inwards lodge -- fifty-fifty though they are embodied inwards the actions of individuals. He writes:
In fact, the thesis nearly the sui generis existence of lodge is simultaneously an aspect of the fundamental sense of modernity too a constitutive a priori of sociology. By definition, a sociologist accepts that “society” exists, distinct from the economic scheme too the polity, too essentially irreducible to the psyche (or biological scientific discipline or chemistry). It does non mean, equally Durkheim (1968) claimed, that social facts must e'er move explained yesteryear social facts, but rather that social facts – that is, social entities, relations too representations – exist, too that they cannot move reduced to psychological facts (or biological, chemical, neurological facts). The 2 fundamental claims that the sociologist should non interrogation are that lodge is relatively autonomous inwards regard to individuals too that sociology makes a transcendental presupposition regarding the existence of this sphere. (kl 248)This passage denies the possibility of reducibility. But it does non deny -- explicitly, anyway -- the ontological premise that social facts are constituted yesteryear the actions, thoughts, too dispositions of socially situated actors; too that is fundamentally what is required yesteryear the requirement of microfoundations.
The 2014 mass What's Critical About Critical Realism?: Essays inwards Reconstructive Social Theory is an first-class handling of contemporary social theory, grounded inwards critical realism but extending to theorists equally various equally Bourdieu, Habermas, too Boltanski. he describes this mass equally being "five books inwards one" -- substantial essays on the pragmatics of internal conversations, the structuration of collective subjectivities, Bourdieu's rationalist social theory, too "post humanism", equally good equally his ain developed concept of metacritical realism.
I sympathise metacritique equally a critique of the metatheoretical foundations of sociology that takes its cues from Talcott Parsons, Jeffrey Alexander too Jurgen Habermas too own got used it to systematically reconstruct the theories of alienation, rationalisation too reification inwards High German sociology.Vandenberghe offers an intellectual geography of Bhaskar's influence:
Bhaskar may move a professional person philosopher, but he has mainly been read yesteryear social theorists, initiative of all inwards the Britain too thence all over the world. Apart from a few incursions beyond the Anglo-Saxon globe (like inwards Italia or Québec, for instance), French, High German or Latin-American philosophers to a greater extent than ofttimes than non ignore his work, non because they disagree, but exactly because it has non reached them. Unlike their colleagues from the philosophy department, sociologists, geographers, political economists too social psychologists alongside a Marxist background too a swell involvement inwards social theory rapidly realised the import of critical realism for the social sciences. By the mid-1980s, the initiative of all moving ridge of critical realism had received a real favourable reception. High-quality books alongside a realist imprint were published yesteryear Ted Benton (1977), Russell Keat too John Urry (1982), William Outhwaite (1987), Derek Layder (1990) too Andrew Sayer (1992). At the intersection of philosophy, sociology too politics, social theorists were probing the philosophical foundations of sociology too cognate disciplines, assailing the ‘orthodox consensus’ (evolutionism + functionalism + positivism) of post-war sociology too reassessing the merits of structuration theory. Thanks to the skillful services of Anthony Giddens, social theory had meanwhile emerged equally a relatively autonomous subfield inside British sociology, piece elsewhere, galvanised yesteryear ethnomethodology, structuralism too systems theory, novel ambitious theoretical syntheses were published almost simultaneously. By instantly the even of the ‘new theoretical movement’ (Alexander, 1988) too its endeavor to overcome the opposition of way too construction has move a hackneyed one, but dorsum inwards the 1980s when Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens, Jürgen Habermas too Niklas Luhmann were writing their principal works, sociology was ebullient. (kl 449)Vandenberghe analyzes Bhaskar's theories into a serial of nested stages:
- Critical realism
- transcendental realism
- critical realism
- explanatory critique
- Dialectical critical realism
- The philosophy of meta-Reality
And he pays most attending to the initiative of all stage, the classical formulation of critical realism. Since this is the most impactful component of Bhaskar's writings inside sociological theory, V's analysis is a valuable one.
These are exactly a few glimpses of Vandenberghe's contributions to a improve agreement of critical realism inwards its intellectual too ontological context. But maybe they are plenty to atomic number 82 readers to bring on both books to detect the lucid too broad-ranging interpretations that Vandenberghe offers of the intellectual terrain of contemporary social theory too critical realism.
***
His trajectory reminds me somehow of the i of Auguste Comte too Charles Sanders Peirce. Like Comte, he started out alongside a potent belief inwards scientific discipline too ended upwards inwards the mystical waters beyond religion. Like Peirce, he is a chip of a genius (he wrote his initiative of all mass when he was 20), but equally he advanced inwards his reflections too deepened his ideas, his writings too his linguistic communication became to a greater extent than too to a greater extent than idiosyncratic, obscure too esoteric. He abuses neologisms, TLA’s (three missive of the alphabet acronyms) too semi-formalised arguments alongside due north dimensional graphic representations, which may good constitute, equally inwards the representative of Peirce, his ‘natural linguistic communication of self- communication’ (apud Colapietro, 1989, xiv). Aware of the problem, he has added glossaries to his books, but equally they are packed alongside internal references they are non e'er real helpful to brand total sense of Bhaskarese. (kl 359)
COMMENTS