Social theory is a well-defined champaign that is centered on a grouping of substance thinkers that nosotros powerfulness cite to every bit ...
Social theory is a well-defined champaign that is centered on a grouping of substance thinkers that nosotros powerfulness cite to every bit "luminaries". These are figures from the nineteenth or early on twentieth centuries similar Weber, Durkheim, Marx, Simmel, together with Tarde; mid-century thinkers similar Bourdieu, Foucault, Gramsci, together with Habermas; together with to a greater extent than recent thinkers such every bit Tilly, Merton, Boudon, together with Coleman. Each brings forrad a grouping of guiding ideas, concepts, together with hypotheses on the set down of which to sympathize specified kinds of phenomena.
It isn't a caricature to imagine enquiry abstracts inwards sociology or social studies that laid out with the phrase, "The essay pursues a [Mertonian, Durkheimian, Gramscian, Tillian] methodology inwards lodge to sympathize the empirical phenomenon of X, Y, Z."
Or inwards other words, these luminaries define something similar a enquiry epitome for sure enough kinds of social phenomena for many social scientific discipline researchers.
My query hither is a unproblematic one; is this a goodness way for social enquiry to proceed? Is it smart for social enquiry to travel theory-driven inwards this way? Does social scientific discipline improve its grasp yesteryear embracing paradigms together with enquiry frameworks inwards a disciplined way?
The basic persuasion I desire to advocate is that dogmatic adherence to whatever unmarried theoretical framework is a bad thought inwards social research. I favor "theory-eclectic" enquiry rather than theory-driven research. It is a goodness matter for researchers to travel deeply acquainted with numerous theoretical approaches, together with they should laid upwardly their ideas to a greater extent than or less the snippets of theory that look most suitable to the particulars. What I hateful yesteryear this is non that researchers should ignore theoretical frameworks, simply rather they should travel aware of every bit many such frameworks every bit they tin plow over notice (within reason) and selection together with select alongside them every bit the particulars of an empirical instance look to warrant.
The rationale for this seat comes downwardly to a characteristic of social-science realism: theories are frameworks organized to a greater extent than or less mutual social mechanisms, in that place are multiple kinds of mechanisms at function inwards a given social milieu, together with hence it is reasonable to invoke multiple theories inwards attempting to explicate the phenomena inwards play. The social Earth is heterogeneous together with plural; then nosotros necessitate to travel pluralistic inwards our role of theories every bit well.
There are social scientists who are strongly identified with a unmarried theoretical framework -- Michael Burawoy, Michael Mann, James Coleman. And in that place are others who are substantially to a greater extent than eclectic when it comes to framing their explanations -- James Scott together with Peter Bearman, for example. And my ain persuasion is that social researchers are improve advised to emulate the latter over the former.
I'm led to yell back nigh this query because I am immersed inwards the Social Science History Association computer program this weekend inwards Toronto, together with the query of the relation of theory to enquiry is ever inwards the air. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 especially interesting session focused on the continuing relevance of Chuck Tilly's writings for enquiry on disputation together with the world formation. (That's a photograph of the audience above.) And thinking nigh Tilly unavoidably agency thinking nigh the relation betwixt theory together with complicated social phenomena every bit well.
So the seat I am led to is this. Social enquiry requires theories of how social processes work. It would travel foolish to ignore the fantabulous function of theorizing diverse aspects of the social Earth offered yesteryear the luminaries. But it would too travel foolish to imagine that whatever 1 of these theoretical frameworks is full together with complete. Rather, the researcher should travel eclectic, pluralistic, together with curious when it comes to making role of social theory to brand feel of a detail gain of complex social activity.
(Friend together with fellow-blogger Mark Thoma at Economist's View volition travel participating inwards a session on Thomas Piketty's mass together with ideas on global inequality Sabbatum afternoon. Welcome, Mark, together with thank you lot for bringing your perspective together with expertise on this effect to the SSHA!)
COMMENTS