Earlier posts guide hold examined or as well as so recent thinking nearly social scientific discipline methods ( link , link ). Here I vo...
Earlier posts guide hold examined or as well as so recent thinking nearly social scientific discipline methods (link, link). Here I volition examine or as well as so other recent contributor to this field, Barbara Geddes.
Geddes is a specialist inwards comparative politics, as well as her 2003 Paradigms as well as Sand Castles: Theory Building as well as Research Design inwards Comparative Politics is a thoughtful contribution to the debate nearly how the social sciences should proceed. Her fundamental occupation organization is alongside the topic of research blueprint inwards comparative politics. How should a comparative researcher become nearly attempting to explicate the varying outcomes nosotros regain inside the experiences of otherwise similar countries? How tin nosotros attain empirical grounds for validating or rejecting causal hypotheses inwards this field? And how produce full general theories of politics fare every bit a footing for explaining these concrete trajectories -- the ascension of authoritarianism inwards 1 country, the collapse of communism inwards the USSR, an outbreak of republic inwards that country, or a surprising populism inwards another? Geddes finds that the theories that guided comparative politics inwards the sixties, seventies, as well as eighties proved to live inadequate to the occupation of explaining the twists as well as turns the political systems of the the world took during those decades as well as argues that the dependent needs to produce better.
Geddes's proposed solution to this cul de sac is to select theory as well as research blueprint closer together. She wants to regain a agency of pursuing research inwards comparative politics that permits for to a greater extent than accumulation of noesis inwards the field, both on the side of substantial empirical findings as well as good grounded theoretical premises. Theoretical premises take away to live to a greater extent than carefully articulated, as well as plans for information collection take away to live to a greater extent than purposefully guided as well as so the resulting empirical findings are good suited to evaluating as well as probing the theoretical premises. Here is a skilful summary paragraph of her view:
The fundamental message of this majority is that nosotros could steer a class through that narrow channel betwixt untested theory as well as atheoretical information to a greater extent than successfully, as well as hence accumulate theoretical noesis to a greater extent than rapidly, if sure enough research norms were changed. Although research norms are changing, basic principles of research blueprint maintain to live ignored inwards many studies. Common problems include inappropriate alternative of cases from which to pull evidence for testing theories as well as a casual mental attitude towards nonquantitative measurement, both of which undermine the credibility of evidence gathered to back upward arguments. The failure to organize as well as shop evidence inwards ways that brand it accessible to others raises the toll of replication as well as that also slows theoretical progress. Uncritical credence past times readers of theories that guide hold non undergone systematic empirical attempt exacerbates the problem. (5)What does Geddes hateful past times "theory" inwards this context? Her examples suggest that she thinks of a theory every bit a collection of somewhat independent causal hypotheses nearly a sure enough form of large social outcome -- the emergence of republic or the occurrence of sustained economical development, for example. So when she discusses the validity of modernization theory, she claims that or as well as so components were extensively tested as well as guide hold held upward (the correlation betwixt republic as well as economical development, for example; 9), whereas other components were non adequately tested as well as guide hold non survived (the claim that the diffusion of values would speedily transform traditional societies; 9).
Geddes does non explicitly associate her sentiment of social scientific discipline research alongside the causal mechanisms approach. But inwards fact the intellectual procedure of research that she describes has a slap-up bargain inwards mutual alongside that approach. On her sentiment of theory, the theory comes downward to a conjunction of causal hypotheses, each of which tin inwards regulation live tested inwards isolation. What she refers to every bit “models” could every bit easily live understood every bit schematic descriptions of mutual social mechanisms (33). The examples she gives of models are collective activity problems as well as evolutionary alternative of social characteristics; as well as each of these is a machinery of social causation.
She emphasizes, moreover, that the social causal factors that are at operate inwards the processes of political as well as economical evolution mostly operate inwards conjunction alongside each other, alongside oftentimes unpredictable consequences.
Large-scale phenomena such every bit democratic breakdown, economical development, democratization, economical liberalization, as well as revolution termination from the convergence of a set out of different processes, or as well as so of which occur independently from others. No elementary theory is probable to explicate such chemical compound outcomes. Instead of trying to "explain" such chemical compound outcomes every bit wholes, I suggest a focus on the diverse processes that contribute to the in conclusion outcome, alongside the thought of theorizing these processes individually. (27)What Geddes's excogitation of "theory" seems to amount to is to a greater extent than easily formulated inwards the linguistic communication of causal mechanisms. We desire to explicate social outcomes at a multifariousness of levels of scale -- micro, meso, macro. We empathise that explanation requires regain of the causal pathways as well as processes through which the outcome emerged. We recognize that social outcomes guide hold a slap-up bargain of contingency as well as path dependency, as well as so it is unlikely that a slap-up outcome similar democratization volition live the termination of a unmarried pervasive causal factor. Instead, nosotros expect for mid-level causal mechanisms that are inwards house inwards the circumstances of involvement -- state the outbreak of the Bolshevik uprising; as well as nosotros endeavour to discern the multiple causal factors that converged inwards these historical circumstances to select nearly the outcome of interest. The components of theories to which Geddes refers are accounts of reasonably independent causal mechanisms as well as processes, as well as they combine inwards contingent as well as historically specific ways.
And inwards fact she sometimes adopts this linguistic communication of independent mid-level causal mechanisms:
To exhibit exactly what I mean, inwards the pages that follow I educate a concrete research strategy that begins alongside the disaggregation of the large query — why democratization occurs — into a serial of to a greater extent than researchable questions nearly mechanisms. The minute footstep is a theorization of the specific procedure chosen for report — inwards this case, the internal authoritarian politics that sometimes atomic number 82 to transition. The tertiary footstep is the joint of testable implications derived from the theorization. (43)And later:
I argued that greater progress could live made toward genuinely agreement how such outcomes [as democratization as well as authoritarian rule] past times examining the mechanisms as well as processes that contribute to them, rather than through inductive searches for the correlates of the undifferentiated whole. (87)(This parallels exactly the sentiment taken past times McAdam, Tarrow, as well as Tilly inwards Dynamics of Contention, where they combat systematically for a shape of analysis of episodes of contestation that attempts to position recurring underlying processes as well as mechanisms.)
It emerges that what Geddes has inwards take away heed for testing mid-level causal hypotheses is largely quantitative: isolate a gear upward of cases inwards which the outcome is introduce as well as examine whether the hypothesized causal factor varies appropriately across the cases. Do state of war machine regimes inwards fact persist alongside shorter average duration than civilian authoritarian regimes (78)? Like King, Keohane, as well as Verba in Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference inwards Qualitative Research, Geddes is skeptical nearly causal methods based on comparing of a modest set out of cases; as well as similar KKV, she is critical of Skocpol's utilization inwards States as well as Social Revolutions: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Comparative Analysis of France, Russian Federation as well as China of Mill's methods inwards examining the handful of cases of social revolution that she examines. This dismissal of small-N research represents an unwelcome commitment to methodological monism, inwards my view.
In short, I regain Geddes's majority to live a useful contribution that aligns to a greater extent than closely than it appears alongside the causal mechanisms approach to social research. It is possible to paraphrase Geddes's approach to theory as well as explanation inwards the linguistic communication of causal mechanisms, emphasizing meso-level analysis, conjunctural causation, as well as macro-level contingency. (More on this sentiment of historical causation tin live works life here.)
Geddes's recommendations nearly how to probe as well as attempt the disaggregated causal hypotheses at which the researcher arrives correspond 1 legitimate approach to the occupation of giving greater empirical content to specific hypotheses nearly causal mechanisms. It is regrettable, however, that Geddes places her flag on the quantitative credo for the social sciences. One of the existent advantages of the social mechanisms approach is exactly that nosotros tin attain empirical noesis nearly concrete social mechanisms through detailed instance studies, procedure tracing, as well as small-N comparisons of cases that is non visible at the degree of higher-level statistical regularities. (A subsequent post volition examine George as well as Bennett, Case Studies as well as Theory Development inwards the Social Sciences (Belfer Center Studies inwards International Security), for an alternative sentiment of how to attain empirical noesis of social processes as well as mechanisms.)
COMMENTS