One specially appealing human face of agent-based models is the piece of employment they tin hand the axe play inwards demonstrating the ...
One specially appealing human face of agent-based models is the piece of employment they tin hand the axe play inwards demonstrating the inner workings of a major shape of social mechanisms, the grouping nosotros mightiness advert to every bit mechanisms of aggregation. An ABM is designed to piece of employment out how a acre of actors of a sure description, inwards specified kinds of interaction, Pb through fourth dimension to a sure variety of aggregate effect. This shape of mechanisms corresponds to the upward strut of Coleman's boat. This is for sure a causal story; it is a generative response to the question, how does it work?
However, anyone who thinks carefully most causation volition realize that at that topographic point are causal sequences that occur alone once. Consider this scenario: X occurs, atmospheric condition Ci possess got house inwards a chronological sequence, together with Y is the result. So X caused Y through the causal steps instigated past times Ci. We wouldn't desire to say the complex of interactions together with causal links associated amongst the progress of the scheme through Ci every bit a machinery linking X to Y; rather, this ensemble is the item (in this instance unique) causal pathway from X to Y. But when nosotros yell upwardly most mechanisms, nosotros by together with large possess got inwards heed the persuasion of "recurring causal linkages", non only a truthful story most how X caused Y inwards these item circumstances. In other words, for a causal story to stand upwardly for a mechanism, it needs to live on a story that tin hand the axe live on constitute to concord inwards an indefinite pose out of cases. Mechanisms are recurring complexes of causal sequences.
An agent-based model serves to demonstrate how a develop of actors hand rising to a sure aggregate outcome. This is evidently a species of causal argument. But it is possible to apply ABM methods to circumstances that are unique together with singular. This variety of ABM model lacks an of import characteristic by together with large included inwards the Definition of a mechanism-- the persuasion of recurrence across a pose out of cases. So nosotros mightiness unmarried out for special attending those ABMs that position together with analyze processes that recur across multiple social settings. Here nosotros mightiness refer, for example, to the "Schelling mechanism" of residential segregation. There are for sure other unrelated mechanisms associated amongst urban segregation -- mortgage lending practices or existent estate steering practices, for example. But the Schelling machinery is ane contributing factor inwards a attain of empirical together with historical cases. And it is a factor that plant through the local preferences of private actors.
So this seems to response ane of import question: inwards what ways tin hand the axe ABM simulations live on said to depict social mechanisms? They make together with then when (i) they depict an aggregative procedure through which a given meso-level outcome arises, together with (ii) the sequence they depict tin hand the axe live on said to recur inwards multiple instances of social process.
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 query that naturally arises hither is whether at that topographic point are social mechanisms that autumn exterior this group. Are at that topographic point social mechanisms that could non live on represented past times an ABM model? Or would nosotros desire to say that mechanisms are necessarily aggregative, together with then all mechanisms should live on amenable to representation past times an ABM?
This is a complicated question. One possible response seems easily refuted: at that topographic point are mechanisms that piece of employment from meso degree (organizations) to macro degree (rise of fascism) that make non invoke the features of private actors. Therefore at that topographic point are mechanisms that make non accommodate strictly to the requirements of methodological individualism. However, at that topographic point is zip inwards the ABM methodology that requires that the actors should live on biological individuals. Certainly it is possible to pattern an ABM representing the results of contest amidst firms amongst unlike behavioral characteristics. This instance withal involves an aggregative construction, a generation of the macro demeanour on the Earth of careful specification of the behavioral characteristics of the units.
Another possible candidate for mechanisms non amenable to ABM analysis mightiness include the utilization of network analysis to comprise knowledge-diffusion characteristics into analysis of civil unrest together with other kinds of social change. It is sometimes argued that at that topographic point are structural features of networks that are independent of piece of employment instrumentalist characteristics together with choices. But given that ABM theorists ofttimes comprise aspects of network theory into their formal representations of a social process, it is difficult to hold that facts most networks cannot live on incorporated into ABM methods.
Another candidate is what Chuck Tilly together with pragmatist sociologists (Gross, Abbott, Joas) advert to every bit the "relational characteristics" of a social situation. Abbott puts the indicate this way: ofttimes a social outcome isn't the final result of an ensemble of individuals making discrete choices, but rather is a trip the low-cal fantastic of interaction inwards which each individual's moves both inform together with self-inform afterwards stages of the interaction. This business of persuasion seems effective every bit a rebuttal to methodological individualism, or maybe fifty-fifty analytical sociology, but I don't yell upwardly it demonstrates a limitation of the applicability of ABM modeling. ABM methods are agnostic most the nature of the actors together with their interactions. So it is fully possible for an ABM theorist to endeavor to make a representation of the iterative procedure precisely described; or to laid out the analysis amongst an abstraction of the resultant behavioral characteristics constitute inwards the group.
I've argued hither that it is legitimate to demand meso-to-meso causal mechanisms. Meso-level things tin hand the axe possess got causal powers that let them to play a piece of employment inwards causal stories most social outcomes. I perish on to believe that is so. But considerations brought forrad hither brand me yell upwardly that fifty-fifty inwards cases where a theorist singles out a meso-meso causal mechanism, he or she is withal offering some diverseness of disaggregative analysis of the item to live on explained. It seems that providing a machinery is ever a procedure of delving below the degree of the explananda to uncover the underlying processes together with causal powers that choose it about.
So the considerations raised hither look to Pb to a potent determination -- that all social mechanisms tin hand the axe live on represented inside the framework of an ABM (stipulating that ABM methods are agnostic most the kinds of agents they postulate). Agent-based models are to social processes every bit molecular biological scientific discipline is to the workings of the cell.
In fact, nosotros mightiness say that ABM methods only render a syntax for constructing social explanations: to explicate a phenomenon, position some of the constituents of the phenomenon, larn inwards at specifications of the properties of those constituents, together with demonstrate how the demeanour of the constituents aggregates to the phenomenon inwards question.
(It needs to live on recognized that identifying agent-based social mechanisms isn't the sole utilization of ABM models, of course. Other uses include prediction of the hereafter demeanour of a complex system, "what if" experimentation, together with data-informed explanations of complex social outcomes. But these methods for sure constitute a specially clear together with rigorous means of specifying the machinery that underlies some kinds of social processes.)
COMMENTS