The annual coming together of the American Sociological Association is taking house inwards San Francisco this week, in addition to it is a...
The annual coming together of the American Sociological Association is taking house inwards San Francisco this week, in addition to it is a seismic sea wave of ideas, methodologies, inquiry strategies, sections, in addition to fields of study. Begin with the program: it is vast. Over v K names are listed inwards the index equally presenters, discussants, in addition to chairs; at that spot are 600 sessions, numerous "tables" for smaller presentations, in addition to an endless current of "authors run across critics." And then many of the books, papers, talks, in addition to discussions seem worth reading in addition to thinking about.
But that poses a hard problem: no i tin mayhap read all the books, mean value nearly all the methods, consider all the fascinating questions in addition to problems raised. So how are nosotros to mean value of the work of this annual meeting? Is it an effective agency of bringing the profession together, nationally in addition to internationally, senior in addition to junior? Or is it to a greater extent than similar a super-sized hardware shop where you lot pretty much demand to know what you lot demand earlier you lot larn inwards the door, or you lot volition last lost with the smash guns, paints, nuts in addition to bolts, plumbing equipment, in addition to sand newspaper that human face you? Can nosotros mean value of the ASA annual coming together equally a house for genuine "browsing", where specialists tin larn exposed to innovative in addition to unfamiliar thinking from other parts of the profession? Or is it a house where the Bourdieusians, the quants, the ethnographically inclined, in addition to the historical comparativists largely locomote on to themselves, similar a segmented social media flow? (One mortal tunes into the DemocracyNow menstruum with its associated twitter feeds in addition to followers spell the other gets her tidings from the firehouse of Fox in addition to its online choirs.) Or inwards other words, does the ASA feed segment into the subdisciplines in addition to their groups of practitioners, then that everyone gets to a greater extent than of what he or she already knows real well?
How would a existent educatee of the dependent champaign of sociology get to brand feel of this vast piece of the mosaic of the discipline? What does Andrew Abbott think? (He's hither -- he could last asked.) One possibility is to seem at the province of affairs historically. Take the programs of the past times 10 years in addition to regard how they accept changed, inwards a diversity of ways: topics, status composition of the panels, sex in addition to race composition of the presenters, heterodox in addition to orthodox approaches to the methodology of sociology, etc. This could last done. We mightiness last able to create a publish of frequency graphs -- the autumn in addition to ascension of Marxism, the ascension of feminist sociology, the frequency of cite of the emotions inwards titles in addition to abstracts, ...
Another approach mightiness last to seem at the plan equally the seem of the "field" of the extended dependent champaign of sociology equally a champaign of ability in addition to prestige (a variety of Bourdieusian approach). Here nosotros mightiness abstract from content in addition to inquire the question, what tin nosotros infer nearly ability inwards the dependent champaign past times inspecting the program? What features exercise the officers in addition to executives of the association have? Do a pocket-size publish of inquiry institutions seem to play a disproportionate work inwards determination making in addition to the choice of topics (Berkeley, Yale, Michigan)? Here i time again questions of gender, race, status, in addition to privilege come upward into the picture.
We mightiness too consider the inquiry of the absolute size of the plan -- the 4+ days in addition to 600 sessions that were included. Is this a skillful size for the profession equally a whole -- if so, why so? Does it laissez passer career opportunities for younger scholars, to assist them larn their locomote into the thought infinite of the to a greater extent than senior practitioners? Does it serve the intellectual destination of broadening the intellectual ambit of the dependent champaign in addition to its practitioners? Is the jumbo size of the coming together actually nearly the association's demand to lay together an annual coming together that is a large success inwards damage of attendance in addition to revenue? What would invalidate the notion of reducing the plan to 2+ days in addition to 300 sessions, with exclusively 2000+ presenters? Would this last seen equally a retreat of the significance in addition to wellness of "sociology" inside American inquiry universities?
Finally, what mightiness last possible past times agency of mapping the knowledge, research, in addition to theory represented past times this sea of research? It seems possible to exercise this, only it would last a daunting task. The most full general possibility is to exercise a database of all sessions, papers, presenters, in addition to books, in addition to code each entry past times several properties. For individuals the characteristics mightiness include affiliation, rank, gender, in addition to race/ethnicity/nationality. (If nosotros could add together the individual's PhD establishment that would last useful equally well.) For papers in addition to books the characteristics mightiness include: writer [linked to writer entry], topic, main references, method, ASA section. Topic codes would demand to last hierarchical -- perhaps something similar this: "race / segregation / urban substance poverty / Chicago".
With such a database nosotros could pose a publish of interesting descriptive questions:
What topics in addition to methods are most frequent?
What is the distribution of contributors past times sex in addition to race?
What is the representation of senior high-prestige researchers relative to junior middle-prestige researchers?
We mightiness too imagine representing this trunk of information inwards damage of network maps. We could introduce a network graph of papers linked past times topics, which would presumably exercise a publish of clusters of papers organized past times affinity of inquiry themes. This map mightiness good supply a dissimilar outline of the "continents" of the ASA, relative to the mapping past times sections of the organization. (That is, at that spot may last many papers addressing race from dissimilar methodological points of thought in addition to deriving from dissimilar inquiry traditions.)
In short, it seems that the annual coming together of a large dependent champaign similar sociology, political science, or psychology tin potentially supply the dry soil for some real interesting analysis of how the dependent champaign plant in addition to changes inside the champaign of academic life.
(Here is a partial remedy for the job of audience self-selection: brand random, unannounced in addition to surprising substitutions on the plan at the concluding minute. Several hundred people came to an early-morning session on "Bourdieu, culture, in addition to empirical research" expecting to take away heed Loic Wacquant -- a sympathetic practitioner of Bourdieu's sociology -- in addition to institute instead the substitute personage of Michael Burawoy, a sympathetic only orthogonal reader of Bourdieu. Burawoy offered a lively reconsideration of Bourdieu's framework inwards relation to that of Marxist historical materialism in addition to theory of class. His cardinal thrust was the deviation inwards the ways that Bourdieu, Gramsci, in addition to Marx mean value nearly degree consciousness. Who, when, in addition to how are the social participants who tin come upward to empathize the weather of their domination? I real much enjoyed his presentation, non to the lowest degree because it was a surprise.)
COMMENTS