Is the domain of "all social phenomena" a valid dependent for scientific study? Is at that spot a house for a purely full gen...
Is the domain of "all social phenomena" a valid dependent for scientific study? Is at that spot a house for a purely full general sociology, designed to endure a theory of the social everything? Sociologists from Comte to Parsons guide maintain sometimes set frontward this idea, together with James Coleman pursued something similar this inward Foundations of Social Theory. But upon reflection, this seems similar the incorrect means of thinking virtually the social world.
Instead, the social public consists of a hodge-podge of actions, rules, organizations, motives, together with the like, at a broad make of scales (link, link). Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 key business for social scientists is to segment social phenomena into related groups of actions or entities, alongside a scientific finish of making feel of how these diverse kinds of materials work. So social scientists should allow themselves to endure eclectic together with specialized, identifying sub-domains of involvement together with uncovering the mechanisms together with processes that are at run inward this expanse of social life.
These considerations brand it understandable that social enquiry focuses on specific groups of social phenomena similar these -- contention, organizations, racial discrimination, norm systems, marketplace behavior, voting behavior, families, delinquency, .... These are all selected groups of social activity together with structures, similar plenty to acknowledge of a condensed description of what unifies them together with plausibly explained past times a similar ready of causal mechanisms together with processes. This provides a logic to the separation of the bailiwick of sociology into a large publish of sub-disciplines; every bit of terminal count the American Sociological Association encompassed 52 sections, each organized some a ready of enquiry topics together with methods (link).
Consider a possible analogy. Suppose nosotros guide maintain simply arrived on planet globe together with guide maintain noticed that nosotros are surrounded past times noises, together with nosotros desire to sympathise this blooming, buzzing confusion. More exactly, nosotros "hear" a broad make of phenomena alongside qualitative properties through our auditory sensory systems. And suppose nosotros wanted to formulate a scientific discipline of sound. How would nosotros proceed?
We wouldn't begin, most likely, past times collecting together with cataloging the sounds that nosotros perceive -- birds tweeting, jets roaring, children singing, elephants rumbling, ... No, nosotros would laid about past times trying to decide what "sound" is (what the physical phenomenon is that underlies the phenomenology of audio through our hearing system). We volition response that interrogation fairly rapidly -- "sound is the termination of vibrations inward a medium inward a for sure make of frequencies, conveyed through a medium that extends from the vibrating object to the sensory detectors inward our inner ears." And together with hence the vast bulk of sounds volition endure disregarded every bit scientifically uninteresting. The essentials guide maintain been identified: a root of vibration together with a medium of transmission. More interesting volition endure the anomalies -- harmonics, differential speeds of propagation, echoes, Doppler effect, ... And nosotros volition endure interested inward the non-obvious mechanisms of audio production together with transmission.
I'm non actually interested inward sounds, but rather inward social phenomena. But at that spot is a possible analogy here. The social public that nosotros abide by presents a bewildering diverseness of social phenomena. Where should nosotros maiden of all inward formulating a scientific discipline of society? Perhaps the clue from acoustics together with audio is this: nosotros tin give the sack ignore much of the phenomena, position the surprising bits, together with await for the mechanisms that underlie this surprising outcome or that. It is the fact of patterns together with recurring surprises that volition endure of primary scientific interest.
There is a unifying characteristic of all audio phenomena — vibrations inward a medium. And likewise, at that spot is a unifying characteristic of all social phenomena — existent human beings interacting alongside each other on the solid soil of their ain mental maps of the public some them together with conceptions of where they are trying to go, dependent to constraints created past times the natural environs together with the behaviors together with practices of individuals some them. But the existent gist of enquiry inward both fields takes house at a to a greater extent than refined level, inward which researchers seek to position mechanisms together with explanations for plainly anomalous outcomes.
What this stance experiment suggests is that nosotros should non yell back of the dependent affair of social scientific discipline every bit the domain of all social activity together with social phenomena. Rather, much of what nosotros abide by inward social life tin give the sack endure set inward the category of noise, best filtered out every bit nosotros focus our attending on surprising outcomes together with mechanisms that allow of substantial illumination together with explanation. The existent dependent affair is diverse bundles of related phenomena where nosotros guide maintain succeeded inward finding some of import structural similarities together with some relevantly similar causal mechanisms.
And nosotros shouldn’t grip out the chimera of a unified social theory that explains all social phenomena — whether rational pick theory, public systems theory, or psychoanalysis.
* * *
This is the determination that I am inclined to support. But at that spot is a dissimilar means of taking this analogy which comes dorsum to giving greater back upwardly to James Coleman's aspirations inward Foundations of Social Theory. If it is agreed that at that spot is a unifying characteristic underlying all social demeanour --
real human beings interacting alongside each other on the solid soil of their ain mental maps of the public some them together with conceptions of where they are trying to go, dependent to constraints created past times the natural environs together with the behaviors together with practices of individuals some them-- together with hence nosotros powerfulness combat afterward all that "general sociology" is possible afterward all. It would consist of (a) regain of the premises that regulation the actors, (b) exploration of the most of import ways inward which actors interact, together with (c) exploration of some of the specific boundary weather condition inside which (a) together with (b) play out inward the actual social world. Much of the variation represented inward the listing of the sections of the ASA higher upwardly takes the shape of enumeration of especial cases inward category (c). But the full general scientific discipline of sociology is contained inward (a) together with (b).
This gloss on the story too conforms to some extent to the scientific discipline of acoustics: a mutual ready of principles defining the physics together with mathematics of the production together with propagation of vibration through a medium, together with a ready of especial cases where these principles make strange results.
* * *
These contradictory conclusions indicate to a cardinal tension inside sociological theory betwixt greater generalization together with greater attending to context together with variation. (This tension is highlighted inward the recent shipping service on Peggy Somers' rebuttal to Kiser together with Hechter; link.) But I'm forced to acknowledge that this is too a tension inward my philosophy of social scientific discipline every bit well. The interrogation of the availability of full general theories inward sociology relates to my ain advocacy for the stance of methodological localism -- the stance that all social phenomena derive from the actions together with thoughts of locally situated together with locally constructed private actors inward proximate relations to other actors. "The “molecule” of all social life is the socially constructed together with socially situated individual, who lives, acts, together with develops inside a ready of local social relationships, institutions, norms, together with rules" (link). But this formulation seems to exit it opened upwardly that nosotros powerfulness aspire to having full general theories of the component instrumentalist that allow us to explicate social outcomes inward price of the features of activity that are identified. And that seems to endure the programme that Coleman is exploring inward Foundations.
COMMENTS